Writing Informed Consent Forms for IRB
Required elements under 45 CFR 46.116, plain-language guidance, sample consent language for adults, minors, and waivers, and common errors.
The informed consent document is the participant's contract with your study. It is also the single most scrutinized attachment in your IRB application. Reviewers read it line by line, comparing every procedure and risk against your protocol. This guide covers the required elements under 45 CFR 46.116, plain-language writing, sample passages for adults and minors, and the waiver process.
What consent actually is
Informed consent is not a signature. It is a process: a reasonable opportunity to understand the study, ask questions, weigh the decision, and agree without coercion. The document is the record of that process. Under the revised Common Rule, the consent form must begin with a concise summary of the key information a reasonable person would want in order to decide.
Required elements under 45 CFR 46.116
Every IRB-approved consent form must include the basic elements listed in 45 CFR 46.116(b):
- Statement that the study involves research, plus the purpose, expected duration, and procedures
- Description of reasonably foreseeable risks or discomforts
- Description of benefits to the participant or others
- Disclosure of appropriate alternative procedures or treatments, when relevant
- Confidentiality statement describing how records will be kept
- For greater-than-minimal-risk research: whether compensation or medical treatment is available if injury occurs
- Contact information for research questions and for research-participant rights
- Statement that participation is voluntary, refusal involves no penalty, and the participant may withdraw at any time
Additional elements under 45 CFR 46.116(c) apply when relevant: unforeseen risks, circumstances under which participation may be terminated, additional costs, consequences of withdrawal, notification of significant new findings, approximate number of participants, and statements about future use of identifiable data or biospecimens.
The concise key information summary
The 2018 Common Rule requires that consent begin with a concise, focused presentation of the information most important to decision-making (45 CFR 46.116(a)(5)). This is not a legal abstract — it is a plain-language summary.
Plain-language guidance
Consent forms must be written at a level a prospective participant can actually read. Most IRBs target an 8th-grade reading level. Use the plain-language principles below.
- Use short sentences. One clause per sentence is a good rule.
- Use the second person. "You will complete a survey" reads better than "Participants will complete a survey."
- Replace jargon. "Randomized" becomes "assigned by chance, like flipping a coin."
- Explain acronyms on first use. PI, IRB, HIPAA are not universally known.
- Avoid conditional fog. "In the event that" becomes "if."
- Name the study team. Participants deserve to know who is asking them to take part.
Sample consent sections
Waivers of consent
Under 45 CFR 46.116(f), an IRB may waive or alter consent requirements if the IRB finds all of the following:
- The research involves no more than minimal risk
- The research could not practicably be carried out without the waiver
- If identifiable private information or biospecimens are used, the research could not practicably be carried out without using them
- The waiver will not adversely affect the rights and welfare of participants
- Whenever appropriate, participants will be provided with pertinent information after participation
Common waiver scenarios include retrospective chart reviews, research using existing de-identified records, and some classroom observation studies.
Common consent form errors
Reading-level inflation
Consent forms written by researchers default to graduate-level prose. Run a Flesch-Kincaid or SMOG score and aim for grade 8 or below. Shorter sentences alone usually solve the problem.
- Missing elements. The voluntary-participation statement and the rights-of-participants contact are the most commonly omitted elements.
- Conflicting information. The consent form says 30 minutes; the protocol says 45 minutes. Reviewers catch this every time.
- Undersell or oversell benefits. "This study will benefit society" without specificity is hollow. So is "There is no benefit" when the study examines a clinical population.
- Omitting video/audio recording details. State explicitly what is recorded, where it is stored, who has access, and how long it is retained.
- Pressuring language. "We hope you will participate" or "Your help is essential" is coercive. Keep it neutral.
- No separate assent. Children are not miniature adults. Assent forms must be written for the child's developmental level.
Consent form quality checklist
- Begins with a key information summary
- All required elements under 45 CFR 46.116(b) present
- Written at grade 8 or below
- Uses "you" consistently
- All procedures match the protocol exactly
- All named risks have named mitigations
- Compensation amount and schedule are clear
- Two sets of contact information: PI for study questions, IRB for participant-rights questions
- Voluntary participation and right to withdraw stated plainly
Next, strengthen the data security language that underpins your confidentiality claims — see the data management guide. If your study involves children, prisoners, or pregnant participants, the special populations guide covers additional consent requirements.